Martin Pion photo Conservion logo
FERGUSON PILOT B.I.K.E.* PROJECT
* Bicycling Is Kind to the Environment

"SHARE THE ROAD" (STR) SIGNS & "HYBRID BIKE LANES"


"Share the Road" signs are of interest as a potential means of alerting motorists to the presence of bicyclists and encouraging cooperative behavior. Such signs may also be used in conjunction with bike lanes. An approach which appears to couple the advantages of both while addressing some of the criticisms of bike lanes is the so-called "Hybrid Bike Lane." This is illustrated below in the Denver approach. A good description is contained in Hybrid Bike Lanes, produced by Urban Systems in Canada.

St. Louis Regional Bicycle Federation members have been debating which, if any, sign to adopt and promote locally. Several different designs have been posted on this web site with commentary. Information was obtained on 12/6/01 from the North Carolina DOT on their statewide "Share the Road" program, which they have been promoting for at least a decade. Additional information was obtained on 12/7/01 from Denver, Co., which is also active in this area. Relevant information is posted below.

Index (Click to go to selected section)

Denver, CO, "STR" signs & pavement markings
North Carolina DOT "STR" sign
Historical - "STR" signs in Chesterfield, circa 1990
Missouri Bicycle Federation sign comparison
"STR - It's the Law" signs

  • Denver, Colorado, "Share the Road" signs & pavement markings Denver Share the Road sign Denver bike and arrow pavement sign

    James D. Mackay, PE, a bicycle planner working in Denver, CO, has provided some nice jpegs of their "Share the Road" signs and bike-related pavement stencils, some of which are reproduced here. In 1990, Mr. Mackay was a bicycle facilities engineer in Raleigh, NC, working in the NC DOT Bicycle Program, one element of which was a statewide "Share the Road" program.

    In Denver they are also using pavement markings to assist cyclists. The stencil indicates where to ride in the lane for safety and comfort.

    For example, where concrete curb and gutter sections are installed alongside the traveled pavement there is a continuous joint running parallel to the direction of travel which can be dangerous for cyclists. The point of the arrow head stencil is located several feet to the left of the joint, providing adequate clearance from that joint. Likewise, the stencil can be used to give guidance when parked cars are a potential hazard.

    Denver STR and pavement Bike Arrow signs near parked vehicles

    The following are useful links for the City of Denver:

    Bike Map Information: http://198.202.202.66/Bicycle_Program/template31482.asp

    Bike Rack Standards: http://www.denvergov.org/Bicycle_Program/template2606.asp

    Mr. Mackay may be contacted as follows:

    James Mackay, P.E.
    Denver Bicycle Planner
    200 West 14th Ave., Room 302
    Denver, Colorado 80204-2700
    James.Mackay@ci.denver.co.us
    Ph. 720-865-BIKE Fax 720-865-3282
    WWW.Denvergov.org

    Denver Share the Road and pavement signs

    Go back to Index

  • North Carolina DOT "Share the Road" sign

    Tom Norman, an engineer with the Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation, NC DOT, provided information on December 6 concerning "Share the Road" signs and their statewide STR program. He advised me that while there may have been a poster used for promotional purposes that said "Share the Road - It's the Law," official NC DOT signs are federal MUTCD (Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) approved.

    NC DOT use a bicycle symbol in a diamond on a yellow ground with a plaque, or subplate below and the text "Share the Road." He added they are now using the new high visibility yellow-green sign which is more expensive. Staying with the official MUTCD sign allows them to tap into CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality improvement) or other federal funds, e.g. safety funds.

    Mr. Norman faxed me a page from the North Carolina Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Guidelines(January 1994) manual (Appendix 4, p 93). This illustrates the sign complete with dimensions and makes recommendations for its use. I recreated the sign using CorelDraw which allowed for the addition of color and some text and reproduce it below.

    Quoting from the manual:

    "Warning signs
    Share the road (W28-1):
    NC DOT Share the Road signs This subplate, when combined with the W11-1 warning sign, is intended to increase bicyclists' visibility without designating the signed roadway as a preferred route. It is intended for use on roadways with high levels of bicycle traffic, but relatively hazardous conditions for bicyclists. Its intention is not to encourage inexperienced bicyclists to ride on the roadway as a preferred route.
    This sign is especially useful in cities and towns where there are a large number of bicyclists riding on streets which are unsuitable for designation as preferred bicycle routes due to factors such as narrow lanes, high speed traffic and/or high traffic volumes."

    Mr. Norman said that the DOT group which does research on highway issues has never studied the impact of "Share the Road" signs but the department does get anecdotal input from bicyclists expressing appreciation for the signs. He added: "We have put up these signs throughout the state and have not heard back from anyone complaining that the sign is unclear or objecting to them."

    When asked about critics who suggest that "Share the Road" signs could be interpreted as "Share the Lane" signs, leading to conflicts for bicyclists on narrow lanes, Mr. Norman said he was unaware of such problems.

    On the basis of this conversation and NC DOT's experience I have concluded that it would be best to push for installation of this sign wherever appropriate, interpreting NC DOT's guidelines as liberally as possible. Mr. Norman may be contacted as follows:

    E-mail: tnorman@dot.state.nc.us; tel: 919 715 2341; fax: 919 715 4422.

    Go back to Index

  • Historical - Signs in Chesterfield, circa 1990

    The tragic death of triathlete John Reif on Wild Horse Creek Road in Chesterfield in August 1987 prompted the erection of the first "Share the Road" signs in the area in 1990. These rectangular 12" x 18" white on green signs show a symbolic car with a symbolic bicycle below, bearing the message "SHARE THE ROAD" at the bottom.

    The signs were the work of the Chesterfield Chamber of Commerce, working with the Chesterfield Police Department and others. They were ordered by the police department from Correctional Industries (since renamed Missouri Vocational Enterprises) in the Jefferson City prison.

    Go back to Index

  • Missouri Bicycle Federation sign comparison

    In August 1996 the Missouri Bicycle Federation published the results of a survey of seven different "Share the Road" sign designs which originally appeared in the March issue of Pro Bike News. Those seven signs are shown below, plus one I've added - the sign third from the left on the bottom row. MBF-publicized Share the Road signs

    Some of the conclusions of that survey:

  • More than half the respondents said their agency used a "Share the Road" sign and fewer than one-third used a "Bicycles on Roadway" sign, indicating the popularity of the former.

  • The "Share the Road" message was preferred by almost 90% of respondents and more than half said this message should be an informational sign rather than a warning or regulatory sign.

  • While more than 80% of people believed the "Share the Road" signs were valuable and make bicyclists more comfortable, only 40% believed they make bicyclists safer.

  • A majority thought the signs improve motorist behavior and encourage bicycle use, and almost 75% believed they improved the tolerance of road users.

  • "Share the Road - It's the Law" signs Martin Pion proposed

    Some, including myself, have expressed a preference for a sign telling motorists they are expected to "Share the Road" with bicyclists and "It's the Law" to do so, rather than one simply conveying the message that there may be a bicyclist on the road. One version of a potentially stronger sign, not MUTCD-approved, is illustrated here, and is favored by some SLRBF members.

    However, this feedback was obtained before the latest information from NC DOT and Denver, Co., which may well swing opinion towards the MUTCD-signs used by those government agencies, evidently with good effect. The adoption of the NC DOT/Denver sign would certainly ease implementation locally, as well as potentially in other parts of the state, and doesn't appear to involve significant compromise of outcome.

    Go back to Index



  • *************Return to Conservion Home Page*************

    Martin Pion, Conservion, 2001