|
TRA #6539 L2
 Introduction
 Overview
 Development
 Propulsion
 Airframe
 Avionics
 Flights
 Good People
 Rocket Links
Author:
Steve Baughman
Web Updated Aug 27
© 1999 All Rights Reserved.
|
|
IF YOU AREN'T FLYING YOUR PROJECT IS STANDING STILL
FLIGHT TESTING
| |
|
High altitude flights require a good eye and clear skies.
Photo by Gary Estes
|
Most folks agree that building rockets is a lot of fun. It can take days, weeks, even months or years
to design and construct your project. It becomes a labor of love, and you, as chief engineer typically
can't help but become more and more attached to your rocket as you watch your pile of parts
gradually evolve into a unified and elegant whole. It's wonderful, but the more attached to one's rocket
one becomes, the more one begins worry about what will happen on the day when you blast your
baby deep into the blue sky. After all, you won't be along for the ride. "Who's going to look after my baby?"
I'm here to provide some advice: get over it! You built it to fly and fly it you should. It's a
rocket, not a monument, so if you aren't going to fly it maybe you should bronze it and put it on a
pedestal out in your front yard. Sure, propellant and hardware can get expensive, and the winds are not always
perfectly condusive to launching, but for gosh sakes don't be one of those rocketeers who never flies.
I offer that advice because flying your rocket is what this is all about. The adrenaline buzz one gets
just prior to lighting that candle can be formidable, and as you realize that it's your engineering prowess
vs. the laws of physics, you might find that you can get pretty well lit too. The suspense is marvelous,
and if your rocket thinks you did a good job, it will come back to tell you about it.
In this section we present the results of our first year of flight tests and beyond.
XRV FLIGHTS AND TEST RESULTS
 "Wind? What wind?"
- Assurances from Mark Carlson, the most fearless and prolific rocketeer I know.
The more you fly, the more you learn about what works and what doesn't. Along the way, you'll likely be blessed
with advice from other experienced rocketeers about this and that, and that can help to lower the slope of the
learning curve somewhat. As long as you are flying and not just camping, you'll find that you can come up to speed
pretty quickly. Sure, you may have to do some walking, and you may have to dig soot out from under your
fingernails on Monday morning, but at least you will have learned something along the way. And that will help
you to prepare for next time.
In the first two blue lines on each of the matrices which follow, we present
site environmental conditions at the time of launch, followed by vehicle, payload, and motor configuration. At the
lower left are four values in grey which were calculated through simulation,
denoting acceleration (Gmax), velocity (Vmax), altitude (Amax), and launch rod velocity (LRV). For launches which
involved a data recording payload, a set of four empirically measured values are shown in
green, denoting acceleration (Gmax), velocity (Vmax), and two altitude measurements, one using integrated
acceleration values (AmaxA), and the final and more accurate altitude reading (AmaxP) from converted air pressure
values. We rely on AmaxP to be the 'last word' regarding altitude. Finally, an occasional debriefing statement
will show what was learned and what was improved upon.
|
|
| Flight 1 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 7/25/98 |
Heart of Texas 98 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
100 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk I |
n/a |
48 oz |
38/240 |
H123W-M10 |
211.4 Ns |
66% H |
2.6 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 7.5 g |
m 0.28 |
1291 ft |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
 
Table 7-1 All systems functioned nominally, received TRA level 1 certification.
|
| |
| Flight 2 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 7/26/98 |
Heart of Texas 98 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
100 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk I |
n/a |
48 oz |
38/240 |
H242T-M10 |
234.2 Ns |
73% H |
1.2 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 16.7 g |
m 0.35 |
1464 ft |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
 
Table 7-2 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
| Flight 3 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 7/26/98 |
Heart of Texas 98 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
100 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk I |
n/a |
48 oz |
38/360 |
I161W-M10 |
333.5 Ns |
52% I |
2.2 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 12.2 g |
m 0.41 |
2039 ft |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
 
Table 7-3 Long delay caused high speed deployment; broken shroud lines, minor zipper.
|
| |
|
Much was learned during this time about motor assembly and rocket construction techniques. It
became apparent on flight 3 that motor-delay style ejection can be unreliaby timed, and factory recovery systems can
be stressed to the breaking point by the resulting high speed deployment. The stock elastic shock cord and parachute
were scrapped, and replaced by nylon strapping with quicklink ends and a more durable parachute. The glued-on
recovery mount was cut away and replaced with a combination baffle unit and recovery mount. The original motor
retainer was removed and upgraded with Romex clips. The airframe was fiberglassed, and a rudimentary telemetry unit
was installed into the previously empty payload bay. The XRV Mk II was now ready for action.
|
| |
| Flight 4 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 9/5/98 |
N Texas Hi Power 13 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
100 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk II |
TMU1 |
96 oz |
38/360 |
I357T-M10 |
341.0 Ns |
53% I |
1.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 14.4 g |
m 0.28 |
1347 ft |
70 fps |
10.4 g (e) |
m 0.14 (e) |
658 ft (e) |
1233 ft |
 
Table 7-4 Nominal flight, however accelerometer vibration caused telemetry errors (e).
|
| |
| Flight 5 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 9/6/98 |
N Texas Hi Power 13 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
100 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk II |
TMU1 |
96 oz |
38/480 |
I154J-M10 |
385.3 Ns |
60% I |
3.6 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 5.2 g |
m 0.23 |
1417 ft |
40 fps |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
 
Table 7-5 Flight and recovery nominal, however all data was lost perhaps due to TMU vibration.
|
| |
| Flight 6 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 9/6/98 |
N Texas Hi Power 13 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
100 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk II |
TMU1 |
96 oz |
38/480 |
I211W-M10 |
440.5 Ns |
69% I |
2.2 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 11.3 g |
m 0.32 |
1829 ft |
57 fps |
9.2 g (e) |
m 0.22 (e) |
1688 ft (e) |
1849 ft |
 
Table 7-6 Nominal flight, however accelerometer vibration caused telemetry errors (e).
|
| |
| Flight 7 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 9/6/98 |
N Texas Hi Power 13 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
100 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk II |
TMU1 |
96 oz |
38/600 |
I284W-M10 |
554.2 Ns |
87% I |
1.8 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 14.1 g |
m 0.41 |
2411 ft |
68 fps |
inc data |
inc data |
inc data |
inc data |
 
Table 7-7 Nominal flight, however accelerometer vibration rendered data incomplete.
|
| |
|
It was clear at this time that the structural upgrades had gone well, however the avionics package (TMU)
had a few loose components that introduced vibration into the accelerometer and at times shorted system power.
This was fixed with a generous application of cyanoacrilate and some rewiring. To more closely determine motor-delay
recovery accuracy, failsafe sensors were added to the payload which recorded recovery deployment. The TMU software
was modified with a new algorithm to detect apogee and ground proximity during flight, though at this time these
events were simply logged and not acted upon. Finally, a one-touch arming feature was added to the TMU to increase
safety and ease of use.
|
| |
| Flight 8 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 12/6/98 |
Paradise 1 |
Eden, TX |
1900 ASL |
65 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk III |
TMU2 |
109 oz |
54/852 |
J275-M10 |
818.7 Ns |
64% J |
3.2 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 7.8 g |
m 0.48 |
3215 ft |
51 fps |
6.5 g |
m 0.48 |
3623 ft |
3390 ft |
 
Table 7-8 All systems functioned nominally, TRA level 2 certification.
|
| |
|
Flight 8 marked a couple of significant milestones, first of all a new certification level was reached, but
most importantly the TMU produced the first solid flight data during this flight. The new apogee and ground
proximity detection algorithms worked perfectly, but it was decided that further testing of these capabilities
would be prudent before implementing full dual deployment.
|
| |
| Flight 9 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 12/14/98 |
Skye Dance XIII |
Kimbro, TX |
650 ASL |
65 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk III |
TMU2 |
109 oz |
54/852 |
J180T-M10 |
825.8 Ns |
65% J |
4.5 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 8.4 g |
m 0.43 |
3277 ft |
55 fps |
8.4 g |
m 0.43 |
3392 ft |
3492 ft |
 
Table 7-9 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
| Flight 10 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 12/14/98 |
Skye Dance XIII |
Kimbro, TX |
650 ASL |
65 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk III |
TMU2 |
109 oz |
54/852 |
J460T-M10 |
812.7 Ns |
63% J |
1.9 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 14.1 g |
m 0.52 |
3234 ft |
70 fps |
10.6 g |
m 0.33 |
3669 ft |
3081 ft |
 
Table 7-10 Short delay caused high speed deployment; accelerometer spike on deployment.
|
| |
|
With two more solid flights complete, it was now time to install all of the upgrades supporting dual deployment.
A forward main parachute bay was added, a drogue chute was installed in what was previously the main chute bay, and
the Pyro Ignition Module (PIM) was added to support the firing of explosive deployment charges. This brings the
vehicle up to the Mk IV configuration, with a payload consisting of the TMU3 and the PIM1.
|
| |
| Flight 11 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 1/30/99 |
Skye Dance XV |
Kimbro, TX |
650 ASL |
65 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/852 |
J460T-M10 |
812.7 Ns |
63% J |
1.9 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 10.6 g |
m 0.40 |
2555 ft |
60 fps |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
 
Table 7-11 Flight data was lost due to user error; minor recovery failure; quicklink broke.
|
| |
|
Though this first dual-deployment flight showed that the recovery system electronics and PIM were working, a
quicklink failure caused the nosecone to fall free of the main parachute. It was recovered undamaged, and in response
to this, all quicklinks were replaced by stainless steel carabiners. Also, the data from this significant flight was
lost again by failing to power down the avionics prior to connecting the serial cable for downloading. Though it
was never expected to be a problem, this instance confirmed that it is an issue which should be avoided by appropriate
power management during downloading.
|
| |
| Flight 12 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/13/99 |
N Texas Hi Power 14 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
65 F |
0 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/852 |
J275W-M10 |
818.7 Ns |
64% J |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 5.9 g |
m 0.37 |
2482 ft |
44 fps |
5.7 g |
m 0.28 |
2600 ft |
2568 ft |
 
Table 7-12 All systems functioned nominally; noted accelerometer spike on deployment.
|
| |
| Flight 13 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/13/99 |
N Texas Hi Power 14 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
65 F |
0 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1280 |
J415W-L14 |
1201.3 Ns |
94% J |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 9.3 g |
m 0.50 |
3950 ft |
54 fps |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
 
Table 7-13 Nominal flight; however flight data was lost due to user error.
|
| |
| Flight 14 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/13/99 |
N Texas Hi Power 14 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
65 F |
0 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1280 |
J800T-L14 |
1264.8 Ns |
99% J |
1.6 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 22.6 g |
m 0.62 |
4226 ft |
89 fps |
11.6 g |
m 0.44 |
4057 ft |
4622 ft |
 
Table 7-14 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
| Flight 15
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/13/99 |
N Texas Hi Power 14 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
65 F |
0 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1706 |
K550W-L14 |
1594.5 Ns |
62% K |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 14.1 g |
m 0.65 |
5218 ft |
71 fps |
10.8 g |
m 0.53 |
6007 ft |
6060 ft |
 
Table 7-15 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
| Flight 16
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/14/99 |
N Texas Hi Power 14 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
65 F |
5 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1280 |
J415W-L14 |
1201.3 Ns |
94% J |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 9.3 g |
m 0.50 |
3950 ft |
54 fps |
9.2 g |
m 0.42 |
4318 ft |
4417 ft |
 
Table 7-16 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
| Flight 17
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/14/99 |
N Texas Hi Power 14 |
Windom, TX |
700 ASL |
65 F |
5 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1706 |
K550W-L14 |
1594.5 Ns |
62% K |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 14.1 g |
m 0.65 |
5218 ft |
71 fps |
11.6 g |
m 0.53 |
5774 ft |
5649 ft |
 
Table 7-17 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
|
North Texas High Power 14 was truly a golden weekend for rocketry, with low winds and a lot of great flights.
Again on flight 13, data was lost due to failure to power off the TMU prior to serial downlaoding. This issue
is perhaps the most frustrating of those experienced during the avionics development accomplished so far.
Thankfully, five of six flight accomplished over the weekend produced beautiful flight data.
|
| |
| Flight 18
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/27/99 |
Paradise 2 |
Eden, TX |
1900 ASL |
75 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/852 |
J460T-L14 |
812.7 Ns |
63% J |
1.9 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 10.6 g |
m 0.40 |
2555 ft |
60 fps |
6.1 g |
m 0.29 |
2260 ft |
2260 ft |
 
Table 7-18 All systems functioned nominally; noted pressure spike on deployment.
|
| |
| Flight 19
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/27/99 |
Paradise 2 |
Eden, TX |
1900 ASL |
75 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1280 |
J800T-L14 |
1264.8 Ns |
99% J |
1.6 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 22.6 g |
m 0.62 |
4226 ft |
89 fps |
9.6 g |
m 0.42 |
4107 ft |
4006 ft |
 
Table 7-19 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
| Flight 20
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/27/99 |
Paradise 2 |
Eden, TX |
1900 ASL |
75 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1706 |
K1100T-L14 |
1618.9 Ns |
63% K |
1.6 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 28.0 g |
m 0.76 |
5301 ft |
94 fps |
16.3 g |
m 0.53 |
4732 ft |
5238 ft |
 
Table 7-20 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
| Flight 21
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 2/28/99 |
Paradise 2 |
Eden, TX |
1900 ASL |
75 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1280 |
J415W-L14 |
1201.3 Ns |
94% J |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 9.3 g |
m 0.50 |
3950 ft |
54 fps |
8.8 g |
m 0.42 |
4304 ft |
4006 ft |
 
Table 7-21 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
|
Paradise 2 provided a wonderful venue for more flight testing. We were pleased to finally burn the mighty
Aerotech K1100T motor in the XRV Mk IV, which is the largest motor that it can contain. This accomplishment
pointed towards a need for a new and improved, more powerful booster, and at this time the Mk V entered the
planning stages. The Mk IV sustainted some rock damage on landing and was repaired.
|
| |
| Flight 22
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 4/11/99 |
Skye Dance XVI |
Kimbro, TX |
650 ASL |
85 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1280 |
J800T-X18 |
1264.8 Ns |
99% J |
1.6 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 22.6 g |
m 0.62 |
4226 ft |
89 fps |
12.4 g |
m 0.43 |
3268 ft |
4109 ft |
 
Table 7-22 All systems functioned nominally; noted pressure spike on deployment.
|
| |
| Flight 23
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 4/11/99 |
Skye Dance XVI |
Kimbro, TX |
650 ASL |
80 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1706 |
K550W-X18 |
1594.5 Ns |
62% K |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 14.1 g |
m 0.65 |
5218 ft |
71 fps |
11.6 g |
m 0.53 |
6223 ft |
5752 ft |
 
Table 7-23 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
| Flight 24
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 4/17/99 |
Coleman Air Show |
Coleman, TX |
1900 ASL |
75 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1280 |
J415W-X18 |
1201.3 Ns |
94% J |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 9.3 g |
m 0.50 |
3950 ft |
54 fps |
8.4 g |
m 0.42 |
4159 ft |
4314 ft |
 
Table 7-24 All systems functioned nominally, however an updraft was noted in the data.
|
| |
| Flight 25
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 4/17/99 |
Coleman Air Show |
Coleman, TX |
1900 ASL |
75 F |
10 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1706 |
K550W-X18 |
1594.5 Ns |
62% K |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 14.1 g |
m 0.65 |
5218 ft |
71 fps |
10.8 g |
m 0.52 |
5661 ft |
5649 ft |
 
Table 7-25 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
| Flight 26
data plots |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 4/18/99 |
Skye Dance XVIa |
Kimbro, TX |
650 ASL |
75 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU3-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1706 |
K1100T-X18 |
1618.9 Ns |
63% K |
1.6 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 28.0 g |
m 0.76 |
5301 ft |
94 fps |
17.1 g |
m 0.53 |
5258 ft |
5135 ft |
 
Table 7-26 All systems functioned nominally.
|
| |
|
After five more test flights at three differents events we concluded that the Mk IV and the TMU/PIM avionics
designs were solid, as long as the TMU was powered off before plugging in the serial cable.
After Skye Dance XVIa, construction on the new XRV Mk V booster was fully completed and it was ready for action.
To support the longer ascents of the Mk V, the telemetry software was upgraded to provide 30 seconds of high
resolution ascent, and was renamed TMU4 (software version 0.4). The Mk V was primed and ready for Paradise 3.
|
| |
| Flight 27 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 5/16/99 |
Paradise 3 |
Eden, TX |
1900 ASL |
80 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU4-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1280 |
J415W-X18 |
1201.3 Ns |
94% J |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
AmaxA |
AmaxP |
| 9.3 g |
m 0.50 |
3950 ft |
54 fps |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
 
Table 7-27 Nominal flight; however flight data was lost due to user error.
|
| |
| Flight 28 |
| Date |
Event |
Location |
Elev |
Temp |
Wind |
| 5/16/99 |
Paradise 3 |
Eden, TX |
1900 ASL |
80 F |
15 mph |
| Vehicle |
Payload |
Weight |
Casing |
Motor |
Impulse |
Rating |
Burn |
| XRV Mk IV |
TMU4-PIM1 |
151 oz |
54/1706 |
K550W-X18 |
1594.5 Ns |
62% K |
3.1 s |
| Gmax |
Vmax |
Amax |
LRV |
Gmax |
Vmax |
| |