THE ATTORNEY IS FREE TO ALL SMALL BUSINESS PEOPLE, MIDDLE CLASS CITIZENS AND POOR PERSONS.
HOW DOES THE RIGHT WORK?
When there is a case before a court, the court charges the loser in the case the fees of the attorney for the opposing party. The court sets up a system where if two poor persons are battling in court, the fees are paid by a fund that is contributed to by losers IN OTHER SUITS, with large sums of money. In this manner, justice is afforded to everyone. The wealthy have access, the middle class has access, and the poor have access. No one is denied justice, and the courts and lawyers are paid by those people that cause the problem and not by those that are simply defending their rights.
Man has always demanded equal justice before the law. If one man goes to court with a lawyer, and another man goes to court without a lawyer, they will not have a chance at equal justice. It is simple, the laws are written by lawyers, enforced by lawyers, ruled upon by lawyers and therefore the person with a lawyer has an advantage over a person without a lawyer.
There is no equal justice if one group sets itself up as the source of all law and forces other groups to obey. Today in the United States, we have a situation where lawyers and judges are all members of the "Bar" and comprise one group that has set itself up to deny the right to equal justice from a second group, the citizens. The first group stole our God given right to equal justice before the law through lies and deceit.
Ancestors of the English people have always had a right to equal justice before the law. In the time of King Henry, the King and his bureaucrats tried to take away the right to equal justice by denying free legal services to the poor. As a result of the actions of the King, threats were made by the people. The King was not successful in taking away the right to free legal counsel. In fact, as a result of King Henry, the law was written down so that no other King would attempt to steal it from the people.
King Charles and his government bureaucrats many years later attempted to cheat the people of their rights through the use of "reticentia" (agreeing to things, and not meaning that the words in the agreement mean what they say). King Charles knew he couldn't steal the rights of the people by being straight forward with the people. Therefore he used "reticentia" to fool the people about their rights. "Reticentia" meant that the government told the people that they had God given rights, and then when the people attempted to use those rights, the government would throw barriers in front and deny people their rights. For example the Judges said people had the right to sue the government, yet they set up rules and regulations making it impossible to get justice. The government said that taxes would be fair and honest, but then the government changed the way and name of taxes and continued to cheat the people.
Finally the people of England caught on to what the evil King was doing. They had a trial and convicted the King and his government bureaucrats. King Charles was beheaded for trying to steal the rights of the people through deceit.
Your right to free counsel was easy to steal for any lying Supreme Court Justice. Our first Congress passed a law that made the English Common Law the rule of law in the United States. The English Common Law and our Constitution gave the citizen the right to free legal counsel. All that needed to be done to steal the right of the poor to free legal counsel was to change the meaning of the equal protection and due process clauses of our Constitution and deny access to the English Common law.
HOW IT WAS DONE
The method used by the courts, and lawyers (the bar) to operate under our law is quite simple in its basic form, and therefore contains a fatal flaw.
----Judges hear cases brought before them by Lawyers.---
If lawyers don't bring cases there is no hearing. Therefore, if an agreement as to what the law is, or should be, is made between the judges and lawyers without the consent of the people, then there is no way for a citizen to fight the lawyers and judges, because citizens have no access to the courts except through lawyers.
Both judges and lawyers and most legislators are members of the "Bar", a rigid affiliation designed to rule the workings of the court and enforce "fake honor" between lawyers and judges.
WHATS IN IT FOR THE LAWYERS, JUDGES, ETC.
Judges, the Legislative branch of government, and the Executive branch of government want immunity from prosecution for their errors, lies, unjust rulings, and outright corruption. Lawyers want money and power. The means to obtain the desires of these people requires only inaction---because there is no hearing if lawyers don't bring cases before the court.
Therefore, in order to steal the rights of the people, all a judge, or lawyer has to do is ignore the law, because the law is the only way to enforce the rights of man. Therefore if one man will not enforce the law for another, a theft has been made with no active participation by any party.
For example, Equal Justice is required by the Constitution, yet if you ask a lawyer to enforce your right to a free lawyer, what will happen? It is not in the best interest of a lawyer to give free legal advice, therefore, he will not take your case. If he does, it is not in the best interest of the "bar" to have your case heard. Therefore, even though you have a God given right to a free attorney, there is no way to enforce the right, due to the fact that no member of the "bar" will give you justice. It can easily be proven that our founding fathers intended for you to have free legal counsel, however, you are never given a chance to prove it.
This is exactly the same problem that the people of England had with King Charles, the right is there, the means to enforce it is there, but the people who must enforce it are crooks. Is it time that someone is beheaded?
In order to become wealthy and powerful and to help out their partners in the bar associations, the judges needed to take away the bill of rights. It cannot be denied that all Judges and Lawyers are wealthy compared to the average citizen and that they judges have taken away our bill of rights.
When our constitution was written people were aware of "reticentia" or lying, that people in power will do to take away the rights of others. Therefore, our founding fathers wrote into our Constitution our basic rights. We were given the right to equal justice before the law(the right to free legal counsel), the right to due process, we were promised that no man would be above the law, we were promised the right to sue the government, we were promised that all rights that were not directly given to the government belonged to the people. Now our courts are saying that the words in the constitution don't mean what they say. Are our courts lying, or was our Constitution written in reticentia? We have a right to know the truth.
We are now surrounded by thousands of crooks in government. They are now telling us that we don't have the right to free counsel and other rights that are clearly written in our Constitution. Any one than can read can learn the truth about the rights that were given by the founding fathers.
Our Supreme Court has obviously lied to the people of the United States. Any fool can read the history of the law and see exactly what was meant by the founding fathers when our Constitution was written. Thorough out this web site will be posted the actual rights that citizens have on both the State and Federal level, and the way the right was hidden. And, when possible, I will post the name of the person that stole the right and how the right can be returned.
History of the Right to Counsel.
Prior the the act of 11 Henry 7, cap 12, the right to counsel was provided for by the common law process of "forma pauperis", in which the right to counsel was paid for by the government.
After King Henry attempted to steal the rights of the citizens there was a civil war. One of the rights given up by the King in order to get peace, was the right to counsel. In order to keep crooks from stealing the right again, the King was required to put the right in written form. This common law enactment is known as 11 Henry 7, cap12 and is one root of our Constitutional right to due process and equal protection of he law.
Our First Congress after the Constitution was given the duty to pass all of the laws necessary for the protection of the rights of the people. To protect the rights of the citizen our Congress adopted the Common Law of England.---First Congress, Sess.I. Ch 20, 1789--- The First Congress did not remove the right to counsel from the common law, therefore the right still exists.
A good source on the Common Law Rights of the Citizen is found in CJS 15 A. Please send a self addressed stamped envelope for a copy of any sections that you are concerned about. Or you may ask me to fax a copy of the areas you are concerned about.